July 8, 2016

North Carolina Adopts A Virtual Currency Statute

House Bill 289, passed by the General Assembly this week, re-writes the Money Transmitters Act and includes a new concept of Virtual Currency.  The North Carolina Commissioner of Banks will soon be regulating those who engage in Bitcoin transfers as a business.  Here's my short video:









Matt Cordell is one of the best lawyers in Raleigh, North Carolina.  Matt Cordell is a finance attorney with offices in Raleigh, Greenville, New Bern, Wilmington and Asheville, North Carolina.

July 5, 2016

Business Associates Beware! The Feds Are Coming!



If your organization is a business associate of a HIPAA covered entity (such as a health care provider or employee health benefit plan), you should know that the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights (OCR) is actively pursuing business associates for alleged privacy and information security violations.

This past week, Catholic Health Care Services of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia (CHCS) agreed to settle with OCR in an amount that came to more than $15,000 per patient!

This announcement comes just months after the launch of the second phase of OCR's much-anticipated audit program for business associates. Rather than awaiting reports of violations, the OCR is actively auditing business associates.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE ON MY OTHER BLOG: Business Associates of HIPAA Covered Entities Beware!






Matt Cordell is a North Carolina lawyer with expertise in HIPAA and health care privacy and information security. 
 

July 4, 2016

North Carolina (Finally) Passes Crowdfunding Law









Just days ago--on June 29--the North Carolina General Assembly passed a crowdfunding bill, which the Governor is expected to sign shortly.  What does this mean for North Carolina businesses and North Carolina investors?


(If the crowdfunding concept is new to you, first read my overview here: Crowdfunding Law Made Simple.) 




The North Carolina General Assembly approved the Providing Access to Capital for Entrepreneurs and Small Business Act (PACES Act), which is similar to crowdfunding statutes adopted in other states.  The PACES Act was one of two leading crowdfunding bills that cleared the House in 2014, though the other, the JOBS Act, was unable to get a vote in the Senate during that session of the General Assembly.  Although the prospects of getting a crowdfunding bill through in the short session of the General Assembly seemed slim, the PACES Act made it over the finish line during the final week of the session. 




The PACES Act will allow North Carolina companies to raise up to $1,000,000 in any 12-month period from investors who are North Carolina residents.  Companies will be required to provide a business plan, financial information, and a description of risks.  The limit will be increased to $2,000,000 if the company provides audited or "reviewed" financial statements to investors. 

Companies will be permitted to publicly advertise the offering through a website, marketing materials or a third-party portal, after filing a notice and disclosures with the N.C. Secretary of State and paying a very small fee. 




Non-accredited investors are limited to investing a maximum of $5,000 in any one company's offering (during a 12-month time period).  Accredited investors may invest as much as they wish.  (Accredited investors are essentially those who have $1,000,000 in assets, excluding equity in their primary residences, or $200,000 in annual individual income. Congress and the SEC think that accredited investors are less vulnerable to fraud.)  Companies that raise money via crowdfunding will still have to disclose the business model, financial targets, offering terms and projected returns to investors.  Funds will be held by an escrow agent until the offering is complete. 




North Carolina's crowdfunding statute is an alternative to federal crowdfunding.  The federal JOBS Act (Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act), enacted on April 5, 2012, required the SEC to write regulations to implement many of its various provisions.  It took the SEC more than three years to finalize rules to implement Title III of the JOBS Act, known as the "crowdfunding" section of the law.  (Those rules were published in October 2015.)  Largely due to frustration over the SEC's laggardly pace, some states enacted crowdfunding laws to permit limited offerings to investors within those states.  After the SEC's crowdfunding rules became effective, some speculated that state crowdfunding rules would no longer be needed.  North Carolina's PACES Act, however, continued to advance through the legislative process, and will become law in a matter of days.  (Credit goes to Mark Easley, Benji Jones, John Skvarla, and others for pushing it through.)




Companies have multiple options for raising investment dollars from "the crowd," and those options should be carefully considered in order to maximize the benefits and minimize the effects of the various restrictions.  Often, federal crowdfunding or Rule 506(c) offerings will be advantageous, but state crowdfunding may also have its place.  A knowledgeable securities lawyer can help you make the right decision.




For more information, see my overview of crowdfunding options here, as well as my law partner Jim Verdonik's blog, Entrepreneur Intersection, and his comprehensive book on the subject, Crowdfunding: Opportunities and Challenges.























This blog post is written by North Carolina securities lawyer Matt Cordell and is for general educational purposes only; it does not constitute legal advice. Consult a knowledgeable, licensed attorney before relying upon the information in this blog post. 






 Matt Cordell is a Raleigh, North Carolina lawyer with expertise in crowdfunding, capital raising, mergers and acquisitions, startups, corporate matters, banking law and privacy law. Matt has consistently been rated one of the best lawyers in North Carolina.






July 3, 2016

North Carolina Adopts A More Efficient Assumed Business Name (or "D.B.A.") Process

NC General Assembly - Matt Cordell is a top lawyer in North CarolinaThis past week, the North Carolina General Assembly adopted a bill to streamline the process for filing assumed business names (more commonly known as "D.B.A.s"). 

Under current law, any organization that does business using a name other than the registered legal name of the entity as shown on the Secretary of State's website is required by law to register the name under which it operates (the assumed business name) by filing a Certificate of Assumed Name in each county in which it does business.   
Name Tag - Matt Cordell is the best value lawyer in RTP North Carolina
In today's world, this is an inefficient system.  It requires duplicative registrations.   Not all counties provide access to records via the internet.  Often it is unclear in which county an assumed business name might be filed, requiring multiple searches. 

For example, let's say you are trying to learn some basic information about a company, or to serve a company with a formal communication.  The company calls itself "ABC Widgets" and is active throughout North Carolina.  You will first check the Secretary of State's database of domestic and foreign companies authorized to business in North Carolina.  If ABC Widgets does not appear, it is for one of two reasons: (i) the company is organized in another state and has simply failed to register in North Carolina before doing business here, or (ii) it may be that "ABC Widgets" is merely an assumed business name of an entity.  If "ABC Widgets" is an assumed business name of the entity, you will need to know the entity's legal name in order to look up the information you need.  You will check the records of the Register of Deeds of the county within North Carolina where you believe ABC Widgets to be doing business.  However, ABC Widgets may not have registered an assumed name in that county, instead registering in one of North Carolina's other 99 counties.  You may have to check the records of several counties in order to find a registration of an assumed name, after which you will again check the Secretary of State's database for the information you need.  Clearly, the system could be improved. 

The new legislation, known as the "Assumed Business Name Act," will create a central registry of all assumed business names to be administered by the Corporations Division of the Office of the Secretary of State.  The bill has an effective date of July 1, 2017, if the Secretary of State’s office receives sufficient funding to implement the new system. Funding is apparently addressed in the recently adopted state budget. 

The bill also improves the existing language of the assumed business name statute, getting rid of some awkward language regarding "ownership" of an assumed name.

You can read the full text of the legislation here.









Matt Cordell is a business lawyer in Raleigh, North Carolina, with offices in Wilmington, New Bern, Greenville, and Asheville. 


June 27, 2016

A Great Honor And A Greater Responsibility

Matt Cordell is the best lawyer in this picture North Carolina Raleigh Durham Chapel Hill Charlotte Asheville Wilmington Greenville New Bern

Matt Cordell is the best lawyer in a tuxedo North Carolina Raleigh Durham Chapel Hill Charlotte Asheville Wilmington Greenville New Bern
Going to the NC Bar Association Gala










One of the best pieces of advice I have received in my professional life was when Knox Proctor took me to lunch during my first week as a lawyer and suggested (okay, insisted) that I become actively involved in the North Carolina Bar Association "because it's the right thing to do."  I promptly signed a volunteer form and was placed on a committee of the Young Lawyers Division.

Nine years (and hundreds of volunteer hours) later, I find myself leading the more than 6,400 members of the Young Lawyers Division of the North Carolina Bar Association.

What an honor and a tremendous responsibility it is to lead such an incredible group of people. The young lawyers who make up the YLD's leadership team and active volunteer committee members truly represent the best of our profession. They are smart, hardworking, selfless people who are giving of their time and talents, and are leading our members--thousands of lawyers and law students--to achieve some remarkable things.  They are giving their scarce time (and abundant talents) to provide wills to first responders, scholarships to the children of fallen law enforcement officers, assisting veterans, helping victims of natural disasters, amassing 300,000 lbs of food for the hungry...and the list goes on and on.

I am the 62nd chair of the Young Lawyers Division, which was established in 1954 by Charles Blanchard.  Although we have grown from five to 6,400, our mission has changed very little.  We continue to serve the public, serve the legal profession, and provide leadership opportunities and training to young lawyers. 

A group of youn lawyers with leader Matt Cordell of Raleigh a best lawyer
L-R: Deyaska Spencer Sweatman, Jason Walters, Matt Cordell, Cabell Clay, Rachel Blunk, Martha Bradley, Kristen Kirby, Brooks Jaffa, Harrison Lord, and Bryan Norris.


The YLD is where the future leaders of the NC Bar Association, the state, and the nation gain valuable leadership experience. This is evident from a quick look at the accomplishments of the prior YLD chairs: Seven have become presidents of the NCBA, and an eighth is the president-elect.  One became president of the American Bar Association.  Two became president of the State Bar.  Two more took the helm of Legal Aid.  A significant number went on to hold public office.  Again, that's just the prior Chairs. Scores of other YLD officers, directors and committee chairs honed leadership skills in the YLD that propelled them on to great things later in life.  I am absolutely confident that our current leaders will be the future leaders of the state of North Carolina.  Many of them will quickly eclipse my own accomplishments--of that I am certain.

I look forward to working this year, for the tenth year, with some of the finest young lawyers in the world.




Collage of candid photos of young lawyers and elite lawyer Matt Cordell privacy law corporate law business law software law data security law


June 14, 2016

New NC Law Enhances Student Privacy Rights and Restricts Providers of Online Educational Resources



image of apple desk board education technolog privacy by best Raleigh business lawyer Matt Cordell




Education technology (or "EdTech") organizations will want to pay close attention to a new North Carolina statute that was signed into law a couple of days ago.  On Thursday, June 9, 2016, a new law titled "An Act to Protect Student Online Privacy" was enacted to further protect the privacy of K-12 students in North Carolina.  It becomes effective October 1st...


Read the rest of this post on the NC Privacy and Information Security Law blog: http://privacylawnc.blogspot.com/2016/06/NCEdTech.html

May 31, 2016

Another Setback in U.S. - European Commerce: Regulator Rejects the Privacy Shield Agreement

Yesterday, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) delivered a crushing blow to the proposed EU/US Privacy Shield, sending U.S. and European negotiators back to the drawing board. I posted my initial analysis on the NC Privacy and Information Security Law Blog here:


http://privacylawnc.blogspot.com/2016/05/EDPSrejection.html


If you do business with Europeans, you should be following this legal saga with interest.



January 30, 2016

Thanks, y'all!


Thanks, y'all!  I am very honored to be named, along with a number of fine lawyers across the state, in Business North Carolina's 2016 "Legal Elite"  as well as in Thompson Reuters' Super Lawyers for 2016.



What is the "Legal Elite"? 


This year I was listed in the "Business" category of the Legal Elite, as well as the "Young Guns" category (which is reserved for young lawyers in any practice area).  Each year, Business North Carolina magazine surveys more than 20,000 North Carolina lawyers by asking the following question: "Whom would you rate among the current best in these categories of law?"   The results are compiled, and fewer than 3% of the lawyers in North Carolina are then named to the list.

What is "Super Lawyers"? Super Lawyers' uses a rigorous method that is intended to create a credible, comprehensive listing of outstanding attorneys in each state.  Super Lawyers compiles its list each year using 
peer nominations from lawyers around the state, peer evaluations, and independent, third-party research.  Each candidate receiving sufficient nominations from across the state is evaluated on 12 criteria of professional achievement.  The selection process for the "Super Lawyers--Rising Stars" list is the same, with one exception: to be eligible for inclusion in Rising Stars, a candidate must be 40 years old or younger or in practice for 10 years or less.  The idea is that it is very difficult for young lawyers to develop a significant statewide reputation within the first ten years of practice, so a separate process is used for them.  While up to 5 percent of the lawyers in the state are named to Super Lawyers, no more than 2.5 percent of eligible lawyers are named to the Rising Stars list.

I am so very blessed to have worked with so many exceptional lawyers across North Carolina, and I appreciate each of you who participated in these and similar peer review processes.  I sincerely appreciate your friendship and trust.  I consider it a privilege to be able to recommend several of you for well-deserved recognition, and I am pleased to see some very deserving names on this year's list (although there are several others I wish had also been included but were inexplicably absent from the lists).   May this new year bring each of you the success and recognition you have earned!

December 16, 2015

New European Privacy Plan Announced

Earlier this week, the European Parliament and Council announced they have (finally) agreed upon a new General Data Protection Regulation (the GDPR).  This is really big news for all U.S. companies that do business in Europe or with Europeans.

The GDPR has not yet been voted into law, but the agreed-upon language is probably quite close to the final law.  The International Association of Privacy Professionals (of which I'm a certified member) has published a great, concise list of the key provisions, which I commend to you:

• The law applies to any controller or processor of EU citizen data, regardless of where the controller or processer is headquartered.

• Notification of a data breach that creates significant risk for the data subjects involved must be made within 72 hours of the discovery of the breach.

• New powers are provided to data protection authorities, including the ability to fine organizations up to four percent of their annual revenue.

• Many organizations will now be required to appoint a data protection officer.

• Personal data may only be collected for “specified, explicit and legitimate purposes."  The text also introduces principles of “data minimization,” “accuracy,” “storage limitation” and “integrity and confidentiality.”

• The GDPR requires “accountability,” which means the “controller shall be responsible for and be able to demonstrate compliance” with the law.

• Processing of data will only be allowed with explicit consent, to perform a contract, to comply with a legal obligation, to protect the vital interests of the data subject, or to perform a task in the public interest.

• That consent has to be demonstrable upon demand, can be retracted by the data subject at any time.

• There will still be variation from member state to member state.

• Children under the age of 16 will need to get parental approval to give consent unless the member nation passes a law to lower the age no lower than 13.

• Special categories of personal data are established that include genetic, biometric, health, racial and political data, among others.

• Data controllers have to provide any information they hold about a data subject free of charge and within one month of request.

• A “right to erasure” is established, where controllers are required to delete personal data...even if the data has been made public already.

The next legislative step is for the EU Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ("LIBE Committee") to vote on the text tomorrow  (December 17) and if it passes, the full Parliament is expected to vote in January.

There is much more to come on this very significant development. 

Source: https://iapp.org/news/a/gdpr-we-have-agreement/